Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323930›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2024

An efficient grasping shared control architecture for unpredictable and unspecified tasks.

Shaowen Cheng, Yongbin Jin, Yanhong Liang, Lei Jiang, Hongtao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaowen ChengCenter for X-Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yongbin JinCenter for X-Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yanhong LiangCenter for X-Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lei JiangCenter for X-Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hongtao WangCenter for X-Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot control in complex and unpredictable scenarios presents challenges such as adaptability, robustness, and human-robot interaction. These scenarios often require robots to perform tasks that involve unknown objects in unstructured environments with high levels of uncertainty. Traditional control methods, such as automatic control, may not be suitable due to their limited adaptability and reliance on prior knowledge. Human-in-the-loop method faces issues such as insufficient feedback, increased failure rates due to noise and delays, and lack of operator immersion, preventing the achievement of human-level performance. This study proposed a shared control framework to achieve a trade-off between efficiency and adaptability by combing the advantages of both teleoperation and automatic control method. The proposed approach combines the advantages of both human and automatic control methods to achieve a balance between performance and adaptability. We developed a linear model to compare three control methods and analyzed the impact of position noise and communication delays on performance. The real-world implementation of the shared control system demonstrates its effectiveness in object grasping and manipulation tasks. The results suggest that shared control can significantly improve grasping efficiency while maintaining adaptability in task execution for practical robotics applications.

Indexed as

graspinghuman-centered roboticsmotion planningshared controlteleoperation

Identifiers

PMID39323930
PMCPMC11422345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.