ReviewBJUI compass2024
Analysis of urinary volatile organic compounds for prostate cancer diagnosis: A systematic review.
Review in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viral infections alter the human salivary volatilome.mSphere · 2026Article
- Olfactory Science and Technology in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Invertebrate Models to Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ambient aromatic hydrocarbons and prostate cancer: mechanistic evidence linking benzene and PAH exposure to tumor progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Article
- A Novel Sample Preparation Method for GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Whole Blood for Veterinary Use.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Analysis of urinary volatile organic compounds for prostate cancer diagnosis: A systematic review.BJUI compass · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2024
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Prostate-specific antigen is non-specific for prostate cancer. This is improved by multiparametric MRI but a significant amount of indolent prostate cancer is detected by the current MRI pathway and data is emerging that clinically significant cancers maybe missed using a standard PSA threshold. Volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis may offer novel biomarkers for prostate cancer and clinically significant disease. Objective: To perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the current evidence for the use of VOCs as novel biomarkers for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was undertaken by two independent reviewers and papers were assessed for inclusion in the review. Study characteristics, sensitivity and specificity of GC-MS or eNose were extracted. Risk of bias and applicability issues were determined using QUADAS 2 and the quality of reporting using the STARD checklist. Evidence Synthesis: Nineteen studies were included, of which 6 utilised eNose and 13 GC-MS. eNose sensitivity and specificity were 0.71-0.95 and 0.79-0.96, respectively, and GC-MS found a sensitivity and specificity of 0.66-1.00 and 0.53-0.97, respectively. There were concerns about bias in patient recruitment due to differences in the timing of the index test relative to the reference standard. Conclusion: This review has found promising early results for urinary metabolomics in the detection of prostate cancer. However, there is a need for larger, high-quality studies to validate this. Future work should focus on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.