Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323924›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2024

Analysis of urinary volatile organic compounds for prostate cancer diagnosis: A systematic review.

Jonathon Dawson, Kraig Green, Henry Lazarowicz, Phil Cornford, Chris Probert

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Erratum.BJUI compass · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathon DawsonUniversity of Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0603-7392
Kraig GreenUniversity of Liverpool UK.
Henry LazarowiczLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust UK.
Phil CornfordLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust UK.
Chris ProbertUniversity of Liverpool UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Prostate-specific antigen is non-specific for prostate cancer. This is improved by multiparametric MRI but a significant amount of indolent prostate cancer is detected by the current MRI pathway and data is emerging that clinically significant cancers maybe missed using a standard PSA threshold. Volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis may offer novel biomarkers for prostate cancer and clinically significant disease. Objective: To perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the current evidence for the use of VOCs as novel biomarkers for prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was undertaken by two independent reviewers and papers were assessed for inclusion in the review. Study characteristics, sensitivity and specificity of GC-MS or eNose were extracted. Risk of bias and applicability issues were determined using QUADAS 2 and the quality of reporting using the STARD checklist. Evidence Synthesis: Nineteen studies were included, of which 6 utilised eNose and 13 GC-MS. eNose sensitivity and specificity were 0.71-0.95 and 0.79-0.96, respectively, and GC-MS found a sensitivity and specificity of 0.66-1.00 and 0.53-0.97, respectively. There were concerns about bias in patient recruitment due to differences in the timing of the index test relative to the reference standard. Conclusion: This review has found promising early results for urinary metabolomics in the detection of prostate cancer. However, there is a need for larger, high-quality studies to validate this. Future work should focus on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Indexed as

diagnosticseNosegas chromatography mass spectrometrymetabolomicsprostate cancervolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID39323924
PMCPMC11420098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.