Gendered farmer perceptions towards soil nutrition and willingness to pay for a cafetière-style filter system for

Philip Kamau, Ibrahim Ndirangu, Samantha Richardson, Nicole Pamme, Jesse Gitaka

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip KamauDirectorate of Research and Development, Mount Kenya University, P.O. Box 342-01000, Thika, Kenya.

Ibrahim NdiranguDirectorate of Research and Development, Mount Kenya University, P.O. Box 342-01000, Thika, Kenya.

Samantha RichardsonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.

Nicole PammeDepartment of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm Univeristy, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.

Jesse GitakaDirectorate of Research and Development, Mount Kenya University, P.O. Box 342-01000, Thika, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil nutrition is a key pillar in agricultural productivity. However, point-of-need testing for soil nutrition is not readily available in resource-limited settings such as Kenya. We set out to study the perceived need for soil testing among farmers in this country. A group of 547 farmers from Murang'a and Kiambu counties in central Kenya were recruited through multi-stage sampling to help assess the perceptions and willingness to pay (WTP) toward a prototype technology for surveillance of

Indexed as

cafetière-style filter systemin-situ soil testingmicrofluidic paper-based analytical devicessoil nutritionwillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID39323851

DOI10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37568

PMCPMC11422606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.