ArticleHeliyon2024
Systematic analysis of constitutive models of brain tissue materials based on compression tests.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melt Electrowriting High Resolution Poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Engineering.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Mechanical Characterisation of Grey, White, and Interface Behaviour in the Brain.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It's crucial to understand the biomechanical properties of brain tissue to comprehend the potential mechanisms of traumatic brain injury. This study, distinct from homogeneous models, integrates axonal coupling in both axial and transverse compressive experiments within a continuum mechanics framework to capture its intricate mechanical behaviors. Fresh porcine brains underwent unconfined compression at strain rates of 0.001/s and 0.1/s to 0.3 strain, allowing for a comprehensive statistical analysis of the directional, regional, and strain-rate-dependent mechanical properties of brain tissue. The established constitutive model, fitted to experimental data, delineates material parameters providing intuitive insights into the stiffness of gray/white matter isotropic matrices and neural fibers. Additionally, it predicts the mechanical performance of white matter matrix and axonal fibers under compressive loading. Results reveal that gray matter is insensitive to loading direction, exhibiting insignificant stiffness variations within regions. White matter, however, displays no significant differences in mechanical properties under axial and transverse loading, with an overall higher average stress than gray matter and a more pronounced strain-rate effect. Stress-strain curves indicate that, under axial compression, white matter axons primarily resist the load before transitioning to a matrix-dominated response. Under transverse loading, axonal fibers exhibit weaker resistance to lateral pressure. The mechanical behavior of brain tissue is highly dependent on loading rate, region, direction, and peak strain. This study, by combining experimentation with phenomenological modeling, elucidates certain phenomena, contributing valuable insights for the development of precise computational models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.