Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323817›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Progress and recommendations of developing occupational exposure limits for noise-A systematic review.

Anke Zeng, Yuwen Huang, Jiarui Xin, Jinzhe Li, Wei Qiu, Meibian Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anke ZengNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Yuwen HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiarui XinNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Jinzhe LiNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Wei QiuYangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Zhejiang, China.
Meibian ZhangNational Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.

Funding

The Study of cochlear synaptopathyR01DC015990 · NIDCD · PLATTSBURGH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI QIU, WEI · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Noise exposure limit is one of the critical measures to prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This review aimed to review the progress and recommendations for developing occupational exposure limits (OELs) for workplace noise. Methods: A systematic review was used. Thirty-eight national or international organizations' noise exposure standards (including OEL) and laws, regulations, and guidelines for noise exposure control were analyzed. Articles on recommendations for revising noise OEL standards between 2000 and 2023 were selected. Results: The definition of different noise types (especially for non-steady and impulsive noise) varied worldwide, and the used 8-h OEL varied from 80 to 90 dB(A). Maximum sound pressure level (L Conclusions: Indicators such as L

Indexed as

Exposure controlNoiseOccupational exposure limitReviewStandard

Identifiers

PMID39323817
PMCPMC11422601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.