Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323802›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Dual vision Transformer-DSUNET with feature fusion for brain tumor segmentation.

Mohammed Zakariah, Muna Al-Razgan, Taha Alfakih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed ZakariahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Applied Studies and Community Service, King Saud University, P.O. Box 22459, Riyadh, 11495, Saudi Arabia.
Muna Al-RazganDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11345, Saudi Arabia.
Taha AlfakihDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are one of the leading causes of cancer death; screening early is the best strategy to diagnose and treat brain tumors. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is extensively utilized for brain tumor diagnosis; nevertheless, achieving improved accuracy and performance, a critical challenge in most of the previously reported automated medical diagnostics, is a complex problem. The study introduces the Dual Vision Transformer-DSUNET model, which incorporates feature fusion techniques to provide precise and efficient differentiation between brain tumors and other brain regions by leveraging multi-modal MRI data. The impetus for this study arises from the necessity of automating the segmentation process of brain tumors in medical imaging, a critical component in the realms of diagnosis and therapy strategy. The BRATS 2020 dataset is employed to tackle this issue, an extensively utilized dataset for segmenting brain tumors. This dataset encompasses multi-modal MRI images, including T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T1Gd (contrast-enhanced), and FLAIR modalities. The proposed model incorporates the dual vision idea to comprehensively capture the heterogeneous properties of brain tumors across several imaging modalities. Moreover, feature fusion techniques are implemented to augment the amalgamation of data originating from several modalities, enhancing the accuracy and dependability of tumor segmentation. The Dual Vision Transformer-DSUNET model's performance is evaluated using the Dice Coefficient as a prevalent metric for quantifying segmentation accuracy. The results obtained from the experiment exhibit remarkable performance, with Dice Coefficient values of 91.47 % for enhanced tumors, 92.38 % for core tumors, and 90.88 % for edema. The cumulative Dice score for the entirety of the classes is 91.29 %. In addition, the model has a high level of accuracy, roughly 99.93 %, which underscores its durability and efficacy in segmenting brain tumors. Experimental findings demonstrate the integrity of the suggested architecture, which has quickly improved the detection accuracy of many brain diseases.

Indexed as

Brain tumor segmentationBrats datasetDice coefficientDual vision transformerFeature fusion

Identifiers

PMID39323802
PMCPMC11422567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.