Possible mechanism of action potential propagation mediated by static electric field: A novel assumption of understanding nerve interaction and ephaptic coupling.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A Multifunctional MWCNTs-Reinforced Chitosan-Gelatin Conducting Hydrogel for Triboelectric Nanogenerator and Artificial Opto-Electronic Synapse Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
   Article
2. From Neurovascular Compression to Neural Hyperexcitability: Integrating Microanatomy, Electrophysiology, and Computational Neuroscience to Understand Trigeminal Neuralgia and Hemifacial Spasm.Cells · 2026
   Review
3. Reduced dynamical variability in depression: evidence from EEG and QIF-E network simulation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract