Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323775›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Predicting the involvement of polyQ- and polyA in protein-protein interactions by their amino acid context.

Pablo Mier, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo MierInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hans-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Miguel A Andrade-NavarroInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hans-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homorepeats, specifically polyglutamine (polyQ) and polyalanine (polyA), are often implicated in protein-protein interactions (PPIs). So far, a method to predict the participation of homorepeats in protein interactions is lacking. We propose a machine learning approach to identify PPI-involved polyQ and polyA regions within the human proteome based on known interacting regions. Using the dataset of human homorepeats, we identified 157 polyQ and 745 polyA regions potentially involved in PPIs. Machine learning models, trained on amino acid context and homorepeat length, demonstrated high precision (0.90-0.98) but variable recall (0.42-0.85). Random forest outperformed other models (AUC polyQ = 0.686, AUC polyA = 0.732) using the positions surrounding the homorepeat -10 to +10. Integrating paralog information marginally improved predictions but was excluded for model simplicity. Further optimization revealed that for polyQ, using amino acid surrounding positions from -6 to +6 increased AUC to 0.715. For polyA, no improvement was found. Incorporating coiled coil overlap information enhanced polyA predictions (AUC = 0.745) but not polyQ. Finally, we applied these models to predict PPI involvement across all polyQ and polyA regions, identifying potential interactions. Case studies illustrated the method's predictive capacity, highlighting known interacting regions with high scores and elucidating potential false negatives.

Indexed as

HomorepeatMachine learningPolyalaninePolyglutamineProtein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID39323775
PMCPMC11422028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.