ArticleCureus2024
Subacute Combined Degeneration of the Spine: A Case Study of Delayed Diagnosis in the Emergency Department.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subacute combined degeneration of the spine (SCDS) is a well-known disease that classically presents with progressive sensory and motor deficits and characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, leading to its use as a key diagnostic tool. However, clinical and MRI findings in SCDS may be diverse, and thus, a high index of suspicion should be maintained for this disease, which can cause irreversible neurological damage if left untreated. In this article, we report the case of a 29-year-old female with significant recent life stressors and otherwise unremarkable medical history who presented with progressive weakness of the bilateral lower extremities who previously had unremarkable computed tomography (CT) and MRI completed at an outside hospital for the same symptoms, which had since continued to worsen. Her presentation at our emergency department (ED) prompted urgent evaluation with an MR cord compression study and neurology consultation. This workup resulted in an unremarkable preliminary MR read, and she was without anemia in laboratory studies. Given this, she was ultimately discharged with high suspicion for conversion disorder. After an addendum report from radiology with concern for subacute combined degeneration of the spine, she was called back to the ED where further workup revealed pernicious anemia leading to SCDS. This case highlights the importance of maintaining suspicion and avoiding premature closure in patients with reported neurological deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.