Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323602›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2024

A multi-national survey to identify health professionals' opinions for the appropriate frequency of urine output monitoring in post-operative patients.

Hannah Baggot, Martin Whyte, Lui Forni, Luke Hodgson, Christina Koulouglioti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah BaggotIntensive Care Unit, University Hospitals Sussex, Chichester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-905X
Martin WhyteMetabolic Medicine, Faculty of Health and medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Lui ForniIntensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Luke HodgsonUniversity Hospitals Sussex, Chichester, UK.
Christina KoulougliotiUniversity Hospitals Sussex, Chichester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3227-6696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urine output is an important clinical measurement and oliguria may highlight the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) earlier than serum creatinine (sCr). Despite the importance of urine output monitoring, there are no definitive guidelines or recommendations for best practice. A survey was sent to healthcare professionals with a specialist interest in AKI to gather opinions of what constitutes a good standard of urine output monitoring and by corollary missed care, post- major surgery. Data was gathered from 221 respondents. Results will inform audit and improvement projects in post-operative nursing care.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryhospitalmissed careoliguriasurgeryUrine output monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39323602
PMCPMC11421269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.