Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323575›Full record

ReviewPlant and soil2024

Root phenotypes for improved nitrogen capture.

Jonathan P Lynch, Tania Galindo-Castañeda, Hannah M Schneider, Jagdeep Singh Sidhu, Harini Rangarajan, Larry M York

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant and soil, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Understanding the genetics of root system architecture in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.].TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbial drivers of root plasticity.The New phytologist · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan P LynchDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-9790
Tania Galindo-CastañedaDepartment of Environmental System Service, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-4162
Hannah M SchneiderDepartment of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, 6700AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-6250
Jagdeep Singh SidhuDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4672-3701
Harini RangarajanDepartment of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4575-9251
Larry M YorkBiosciences Division and Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-9479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal nitrogen availability is a primary constraint for crop production in low-input agroecosystems, while nitrogen fertilization is a primary contributor to the energy, economic, and environmental costs of crop production in high-input agroecosystems. In this article we consider avenues to develop crops with improved nitrogen capture and reduced requirement for nitrogen fertilizer. Scope: Intraspecific variation for an array of root phenotypes has been associated with improved nitrogen capture in cereal crops, including architectural phenotypes that colocalize root foraging with nitrogen availability in the soil; anatomical phenotypes that reduce the metabolic costs of soil exploration, improve penetration of hard soil, and exploit the rhizosphere; subcellular phenotypes that reduce the nitrogen requirement of plant tissue; molecular phenotypes exhibiting optimized nitrate uptake kinetics; and rhizosphere phenotypes that optimize associations with the rhizosphere microbiome. For each of these topics we provide examples of root phenotypes which merit attention as potential selection targets for crop improvement. Several cross-cutting issues are addressed including the importance of soil hydrology and impedance, phenotypic plasticity, integrated phenotypes, in silico modeling, and breeding strategies using high throughput phenotyping for co-optimization of multiple phenes. Conclusions: Substantial phenotypic variation exists in crop germplasm for an array of root phenotypes that improve nitrogen capture. Although this topic merits greater research attention than it currently receives, we have adequate understanding and tools to develop crops with improved nitrogen capture. Root phenotypes are underutilized yet attractive breeding targets for the development of the nitrogen efficient crops urgently needed in global agriculture.

Indexed as

AnatomyArchitectureCrop breedingModelingNitrogenPhysiologyPlasticityRhizosphereRootRoot phenotypingSoil

Identifiers

PMID39323575
PMCPMC11420291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.