Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323475›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Identifying key predictors for uterine manipulator use in robotic simple hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Shogo Kawamura, Kuniaki Ota, Yoshiaki Ota, Toshifumi Takahashi, Hitomi Fujiwara, Keitaro Tasaka, Hana Okamoto, Yumiko Morimoto, Wataru Saito, Mika Sugihara and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shogo Kawamura *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Kuniaki Ota *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Yoshiaki OtaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Toshifumi TakahashiFukushima Medical Center for Children and Women, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hitomi FujiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Keitaro TasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Hana OkamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Yumiko MorimotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Wataru SaitoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Mika SugiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Takehiko MatsuyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koujin Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
Eiji KoikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Mitsuru ShiotaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Koichiro ShimoyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robotic simple hysterectomy (RSH) is the most common robotic gynecologic surgery in the United States. Uterine manipulators are commonly used to handle the uterus during laparoscopic surgery, but few studies have examined their necessity in RSH. This study retrospectively compares RSH cases with and without the use of manipulators, and identifies predictors for their intraoperative use. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing RSH for benign pathologies at Kawasaki Medical School from October 2020 to December 2022. Patients with malignancies were excluded. The robotic surgeries were performed by three skilled surgeons using the four-arm da Vinci Xi surgical system. Data on perioperative and operative parameters were collected, including age, body mass index (BMI), history of abdominal surgery, disease type, presence of ovarian cysts, and operative time. Statistical analyses were performed using EZR software, with multivariate logistic regression to identify predictive factors for uterine manipulator use. Results: The study included 113 patients who underwent RSH without a uterine manipulator and 58 with one. Patients without a manipulator were older, while those with a manipulator had higher BMIs and a higher prevalence of ovarian chocolate cysts and Douglas obliteration. Operating time was shorter without a manipulator. Independent predictors for manipulator use were higher BMI, presence of ovarian endometrioid cysts, and Douglas obliteration. Conclusion: RSH without a uterine manipulator is feasible and can reduce the need for surgical assistants. Predictors for manipulator use include higher BMI, ovarian cysts, and Douglas obliteration. The use of a fourth robotic arm can enhance surgical independence and resource efficiency. Further research is needed to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness and outcomes of this approach.

Indexed as

da Vinci Xi surgical systemoperative assistantpouch of Douglas obliterationrobot-assisted simple hysterectomyrobotic simple hysterectomyuterine manipulator

Identifiers

PMID39323475
PMCPMC11422147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.