ArticleDigital health
A novel self-rating instrument designed for long-term, app-based monitoring of ADHD symptoms: A mixed-methods development and validation study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Psychedelics in the Treatment of Adult ADHD: A Systematic and Mechanistic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Validation of the Multiracial Youth Socialization Brief (MY-Soc-B) Scale with adolescents.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies for adults with ADHD: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Remote monitoring of wide-ranging real-world changes in adults following ADHD medication initiation.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regular outcome monitoring is essential for effective attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment, yet routine care often limits long-term contacts to annual visits. Smartphone apps can complement current practice by offering low-threshold, long-term sustainable monitoring capabilities. However, special considerations apply for such measurement which should be anchored in stakeholder preferences. Methods: This mixed-methods study engaged 13 experienced clinicians from Region Stockholm in iterative qualitative interviews to inform development of an instrument for app-based ADHD monitoring: the mHealth scale for Continuous ADHD Symptom Self-monitoring (mCASS). A subsequent survey, including the mCASS and addressing app-based monitoring preferences, was administered to 397 individuals with self-reported ADHD. Psychometric properties of the mCASS were explored through exploratory factor analysis and examinations of internal consistency. Concurrent validity was calculated between the mCASS and the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale-V1.1 (ASRS-V1.1). Additional quantitative analyses included summary statistics and repeated-measures ANOVAs. Results: Clinicians identified properties influencing willingness to use and adherence including content validity, clinical relevance, respondent burden, tone, wording and preferences for in-app results presentation. The final 12-item mCASS version demonstrated four factors covering everyday tasks, productivity, rest and recovery and interactions with others, explaining 47.4% of variance. Preliminary psychometric assessment indicated satisfactory concurrent validity ( Conclusions: The mCASS, informed by clinician and patient experiences, appears to be valid for app-based assessment of ADHD symptoms. Furthermore, insights are presented regarding important considerations when developing mobile health (mHealth) instruments for ADHD individuals. These can be of value for future, similar endeavours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.