ArticleDigital health
The impact of limited access to digital health records on doctors and their willingness to adopt electronic health record systems.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Towards Electronic Medical Record (EMR) utilization in developing countries: a conceptual model based on systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal medical diagnosis: a mini review of LLM-vision fusion models in low-resource healthcare settings.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- An exploratory study of electronic medical record implementation and recordkeeping culture: the case of hospitals in Indonesia.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Research over the past decade has extensively covered the benefits of electronic health records in developing countries. Yet, the specific impact of their limited access on doctors' workload and clinical decision-making, particularly in Bangladesh, remains underexplored. This study investigates current patients' medical history storage mechanisms and associated challenges. It explores how doctors in Bangladesh obtain and review patients' past medical histories, identifying the challenges they face. Additionally, it examines whether limited access to digital health records is an obstacle in clinical decision-making and explores factors influencing doctors' willingness to adopt electronic health record systems in such contexts. Method: An online cross-sectional survey of 105 doctors with Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery/Bachelor of Dental Surgery (MBBS/BDS) degrees and at least 2 years of experience was conducted, covering (a) personal information, (b) workload, (c) patient history challenges, and (d) decision-making. Results: Out of 105 participants, 51.4% of them use paper-based methods with 56% facing challenges, versus 20% using digital methods. Most (94.3%) interview patients directly, and 80.9% are interested in a web-based, comprehensive medical history system. An ordinal regression model identified that the physicians' disciplines, workload, and efficiency level of the current workplace in facilitating patient history-taking variables significantly affected willingness to adopt the described electronic health record in the survey. Conclusion: Doctors in Bangladesh encounter significant challenges related to workload and clinical decision-making, largely attributed to restricted access to patients' past medical histories. Despite the prevalent use of paper-based records, there is a notable willingness among these medical professionals to embrace electronic health record systems, indicating a potential shift towards more efficient healthcare practices in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.