Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323426›Full record

ReviewToxicology reports2024

Steroid hormones in fish, caution for present and future: A review.

Purba Islam, Md Imran Hossain, Popy Khatun, Rony Ibne Masud, Shadia Tasnim, Mahir Anjum, Md Zahorul Islam, Salman Shahriar Nibir, Kazi Rafiq, Md Anwarul Islam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Purba IslamDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Md Imran HossainDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Popy KhatunDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Rony Ibne MasudDepartment of Microbiology & Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Shadia TasnimDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Mahir AnjumDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Md Zahorul IslamDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Salman Shahriar NibirDepartment of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Kazi RafiqDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.
Md Anwarul IslamDepartment of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The misuse and overuse of steroid hormones in fish is an emerging problem worldwide. The data on hormonal residue in fish was less due to a lack of effective monitoring programs on hormonal use in fish production. This review revealed the findings of previously published data on different hormonal use and their residue and impact. Steroid hormones were frequently used in fish production to promote growth and reproduction. It was suggested that hormones should be used carefully to ensure environmental, biological, and food safety. The most commonly used steroid hormones in fish production were testosterone, estrogen, progesterone, and cortisol. However, the indiscriminate use left residue in the fish flesh above the FAO/WHO permissible limits. This residue in fish caused many health hazards in consumers, like early puberty in children, advances in bone age, negative repercussions on growth, modification of sexual characteristics, and cancer development such as breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. It also harmed fish and the aquatic environment. The most common detection methods for these hormones were GC-MS, LC-MS, and UHPLC-MS. Many countries permitted the use of hormones in fish production upon monitoring, whereas many countries prohibited it. Moreover, many countries did not have any rules and regulations on the use of hormones in fish production. Thus, this review is a wake-up call for researchers, policymakers and consumers on the impacts of hormonal residues in food commodities.

Indexed as

FishHealth hazardMRLRegulationResidueSteroid hormones

Identifiers

PMID39323426
PMCPMC11422134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.