ArticleOman medical journal2024
Complementary and Alternative Medicine for People with Epilepsy: Opinions of Physicians in Oman.
Article in Oman medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Several studies have explored the opinions of healthcare workers on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in epilepsy treatment. We sought to survey the views of non-neurologist and non-psychiatrist physicians in Oman on the use of CAM for epilepsy. Methods: We used convenience sampling to recruit physicians (except neurologists and psychiatrists) from all 11 governorates of Oman. The online questionnaire was open to physicians from 5 January 2022 to 15 February 2023. This study collected anonymous data on their demographics, discipline, work settings, geographical area, and years of practice. Additionally, participants were asked to answer questions about their perception of CAM use and its effectiveness in treating epilepsy. Results: A total of 190 physicians participated, of whom 69.5% were men. Respondents were mostly 36 to 45 years old (51.1%). The majority (52.1%) were general practitioners, 21.1% were internists, 17.9% were pediatricians, and 8.9% were family physicians. Most participants (n = 144; 75.8%) believed that CAM may help treat patients with epilepsy (PWE). The most common therapies that participants considered helpful were meditation (46.0%), prayers (44.7%), yoga (32.6%), and exercise (31.1%). Conclusions: While the evidence supporting the use of CAM for the treatment of epilepsy is scarce, this survey showed that most physicians (non-neurologists and non-psychiatrists), who manage PWE in Oman, believed that some CAM modalities would help treat epilepsy. Well-designed controlled trials are needed to provide reliable evidence on the usefulness of CAM options in PWE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.