Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323406›Full record

ReviewImmunotherapy2024

Immunoglobulin therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases (part 2): considerations for dosing strategies.

Zhaoyang Li, Iftekhar Mahmood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhaoyang LiClinical Pharmacology & Early Clinical Development, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-1107
Iftekhar MahmoodClinical Pharmacology & Early Clinical Development, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.

Funding

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) dosing in treating primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) is individualized, which often involves regular monitoring of IgG levels, and considers patient experiences with immunoglobulin therapies, their clinical status and physician judgment. The frequency and dose(s) of intravenously (IVIG) and subcutaneously (SCIG) administered IgGs (including hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIG) require rigorous evaluation to maximize therapeutic benefits. Monitoring serum IgG levels represents an integral part of diagnosing primary immunodeficiency diseases and determining or adjusting IgG dosing strategies to meet individual patient needs, but cannot be conducted in isolation. This review discusses the current state and future perspectives on dosing strategies for different types of IgG therapies, as well as dosing considerations for specific patient populations, immunoglobulin-naive patients and patients switching between IVIG and SCIG.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulins, IntravenousHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesPrimary Immunodeficiency DiseasesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulins, IntravenousdoseimmunoglobulinIVIGprimary immunodeficienciesSCIGtrough levels

Identifiers

PMID39323406
PMCPMC11457668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.