Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39323402›Full record

ReviewImmunotherapy2024

Immunoglobulin therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases (part 1): understanding the pharmacokinetics.

Iftekhar Mahmood, Zhaoyang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iftekhar MahmoodClinical Pharmacology & Early Clinical Development, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Zhaoyang LiClinical Pharmacology & Early Clinical Development, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4625-1107

Funding

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) therapies have been used for decades as standard treatment for patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Monitoring the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IgG is a key component in guiding treatment regimens. Despite the wealth of clinical experience, substantial gaps exist in our understanding of the true nature of IgGs and their disposition in humans. Furthermore, intrinsic and extrinsic factors may alter the PK of IgG, necessitating an individualized approach for patients. A comprehensive literature review was performed in order to summarize the PK of IgGs, examine the mechanisms of IgG disposition (including catabolism), outline considerations for special patient populations and discuss knowledge gaps and future perspectives for improving our understanding of IgG PK in relation to the individualized treatment paradigm.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulin GHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesPrimary Immunodeficiency DiseasesImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulins, Intravenousimmunoglobulinsobesitypediatricpharmacokineticspregnancyprimary immunodeficiencies

Identifiers

PMID39323402
PMCPMC11457669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.