ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024
'Leaving the Door Open': Perspectives on Decision-Making for Non-Emergency Diabetes-Related Amputation.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Person-Centred Care in Wound Management: A Scoping Review of Frameworks, Concepts and Outcome Measures.International wound journal · 2026Review
- Using Nominal Group Technique to Gather Recommendations in the Decision-Making for Amputation Due to Diabetes.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHaving a lower extremity amputation is a life-changing decision for people living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer. Although previous research has described both positive and negative lifestyle and function outcomes of diabetes-related amputations, limited research has been conducted on the decision-making processes leading up to the amputation. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of persons, healthcare practitioners and experts (including academics and specialists) on decision-making for people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer who may require a non-emergency amputation.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews enabled people to share their thought processes when making decisions for amputation. Twenty-six participants were interviewed, including nine people with a diabetes-related foot ulcer or amputation, nine health practitioners and eight experts located across five countries. There were 13 female and 13 male participants. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis.
resultsFour themes described the decision-making considerations for amputation: 'Balancing the evidence in decision-making', 'Trust, respect and timing of conversations inform decision-making', 'Tailoring decisions for individual circumstance' and 'Reaching the tipping point in decisions for the future'. Work commitments, functional and lifestyle impacts of amputation, the presence of support networks and clinical wound features formed the evidence for a decision for amputation.
conclusionUnderstanding quality of life needs ensured that decisions for amputation addressed expectations and lifestyle needs. Living with a diabetes-related foot ulcer presented daily challenges that pushed people to a tipping point, at which amputation was considered to overcome these hardships and enable them to move on to the next chapter of their life. Further research is required to understand how person-centred factors can be better incorporated alongside objective clinical assessments in decisions for amputation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People with diabetes-related foot ulcers, health practitioners and experts shared their perspectives on the decision-making process for amputation through one-to-one interviews. Consideration of the person in the context of their life, environment and personal needs alongside the pathological factors is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.