ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2024
Diagnostic Performance of CLEIA Versus FEIA for KL-6 Peripheral and Alveolar Concentrations in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Multicentre Study.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Therapies for Sarcoidosis: Molecular and Pathophysiological Basis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Screening for lung fibrosis using serum surfactant protein-D, KL-6, and a deep learning algorithm on chest radiographs: a prospective observational study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterstitial lung diseases (ILD) is a group of lung disorders characterized by interstitial lung thickening due to inflammatory and fibrotic processes. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a molecule secreted by damaged type II alveolar pneumocytes in the alveolar space. The goal of the present study was to compare two detection methods of KL-6 in both bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and serum from ILD patients at the moment of diagnosis.
methodsPatients with suspicious of ILD and followed at two Italian referral centres for rare lung diseases were included in the study. BAL fluid and serum were collected and analysed by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) and fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (FEIA) methods provided by Tosoh Biosciences.
resultsA total of 158 (mean age ± standard deviation, 61.5 ± 13.7, 65 females) patients were enrolled. A total of, 36 had diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 74 sarcoidosis, 15 connective tissue disease-ILD (CTD-ILD) and 33 other ILD. Diagnostic agreement between two methods was demonstrated for both BAL (r = 0.707, p < 0.0001) and serum (r = 0.816, p < 0.0001). BAL KL-6 values were lower than serum (p < 0.0001). IPF patients had higher serum KL-6 concentration than other ILDs (p = 0.0294), while BAL KL-6 values were lower in IPF than in non-IPF (p = 0.0023).
conclusionThis study explored KL-6 concentrations through the CLEIA method in serum and BAL of patients with various ILDs, showing significant differences of biomarkers concentrations between IPF and other non-IPF ILDs. Our findings are promising as they provided further knowledge concerning KL-6 expression across different ILDs and may suggest its utility in differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.