ArticleClinical and translational science2024
Noninvasive skin swab analysis detects environmental drug exposure of pharmacy staff.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Noninvasive skin swab analysis detects environmental drug exposure of pharmacy staff.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The skin is complex with multiple layers serving protective, regulatory, and detective functions. The skin hosts chemicals originating from consumption, synthesis, and the environment. Skin chemicals can provide insight into one's daily routine or their level of safety in a work environment. The goal of this study was to investigate the utility of noninvasive skin swabs to detect drugs in a pharmacy setting and to determine whether drugs are transferred to the skin of pharmacy staff. To answer this question, skin swabs were collected from healthy pharmacy staff workers and healthy non-pharmacy individuals and analyzed via untargeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Drugs were annotated through library matching against the GNPS community spectral library. We then used questionnaire data to exclude medications that participants took orally or applied topically and focused on the drugs participants were exposed to in the work setting. Overall, pharmacy staff had a higher number and variety of medications on their skin as compared with healthy individuals who did not work in a pharmacy. In addition, we identified some chemicals such as N,N-Diethyl-metatoluamide on a large number of subjects in both experimental and control groups, indicating environmental exposure to this compound may be ubiquitous and long-lasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.