Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322961›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2024

Assessment of prolonged safety and tolerability of erenumab in migraine patients in a long-term open-label study (APOLLON).

Hartmut Göbel, Eugen Schlegel, Kathrin Jaeger, Sonja Ortler, Lea Leist

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03828539 phase4completednot on this map

Head-to-head Study of Erenumab Against topiRamate-a Double-blind, Double Dummy Migraine Study to Assess Tolerability and Efficacy in a patiEnt -Centered Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2019 to 2020Enrolled777ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab, Topiramate, Erenumab matching placebo, Topiramate matching placebo
NCT04084314 phase4completednot on this map

Assessment of Prolonged Safety and tOLerability of in Migraine Patients in a Long-term OpeN-label Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2019 to 2023Enrolled701ConditionsMigraine, Migraine Disorders, Migraine HeadacheArmsErenumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hartmut GöbelSchmerzklinik Kiel, Migräne und Kopfschmerzzentrum, Kiel, Deutschland. hg@schmerzklinik.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-112X
Eugen SchlegelZentrum für Neurologisch-Psychiatrische Studien, ZNS GmbH, Siegen, Deutschland.
Kathrin JaegerNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Sonja OrtlerNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
Lea LeistNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfficacy and safety of human monoclonal antibody erenumab used for migraine prophylaxis have been shown in clinical studies. APOLLON is an open-label, multi-center, single arm study, which permits dose adjustments of erenumab and includes an option for a drug holiday. The findings contribute to the accumulating long-term evidence regarding erenumab's tolerability and safety profile in individuals experiencing episodic and chronic migraines.

methodsThe study population consisted of adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine, who had successfully completed the HER-MES study (NCT03828539). Patients were treated with erenumab for 128 weeks at a flexible dose of either 70 mg or 140 mg. Treatment discontinuation attempts were allowed as voluntary single treatment interruption ('drug holiday') of up to 24 weeks.

results701 patients were enrolled in APOLLON. The exposure associated incidence rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) (N = 601) per 100 subject years was 101.71 (95% CI [92.28; 111.14]) meaning a patient could expect having about one adverse event per each year of treatment. EAIR was higher in females (n = 524, EAIR: 104.40, 95% CI [93.93; 114.86]) than in males (n = 77, EAIR: 86.55, 95% CI [65.39; 107.71]) and increased with initial monthly migraine days (MMD) and prior prophylactic treatment failures. A total of 155 patients discontinued erenumab treatment during open-label treatment phase. Of these, 29 were due to AEs (4.1% of total cohort) and out of these 65.5% (N = 19) were considered treatment-related. Safety parameters were in line with HER-MES data and did not reveal new safety signals. Drug holidays were realized by 108 patients (15.4%), of which 64.8% (N = 70) returned to treatment. The mean number of monthly headache days (MHDs), MMDs, and days with acute headache medication significantly increased during drug holiday. After resumption of erenumab treatment, a rapid reduction of the migraine parameters was observed.

conclusionsAPOLLON provides long-term safety and tolerability data confirming the beneficial safety profile of erenumab over a period of 128 weeks. In addition, reversibility of migraine deterioration during drug holiday was shown and most patients returned to their treatment with similar response rates compared to initial treatment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04084314 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04084314 ), First submitted: 2019-09-06.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedMigraine DisordersAdultCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment InterruptionTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabChronic migraineDrug holidayEpisodic migraineErenumabLong-term safetyMonoclonal antibodyTolerability

Identifiers

PMID39322961
PMCPMC11423512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.