ArticleBMC geriatrics2024
Application of STOPP/START criteria in older patients in primary care using RStudio®.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate the frequency of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in outpatients according to STOPP/START criteria, and to identify risk factors. For this purpose, an algorithm was developed and validated in RStudio® based on the information collected in the electronic prescription.
methodsThe data corresponds to dispensations from two pharmacies in Spain made to patients over 18 years, over 4 years. For the analysis, only patients aged ≥ 65 years who are targeted by the STOPP/START criteria are included. The statistical programming language RStudio® was used to develop the algorithm. The STOPP criteria used as models for the implementation of the method were L2 and B12. A logistic regression analysis was performed.
resultsA total of 15,601 treatment plans were obtained from 2312 patients ≥ 65 years (56% women), of whom 46.6% had polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs) and 9.3% had excessive polypharmacy (≥ 10 drugs). In this group, PIPs were detected in 57% of patients and in 38% of their treatment plans; of these PIPs the most common were those related to the use of benzodiazepines for more than 28 days (D5 criterion) in 25.9% of patients, followed by the use of opioids prescribed without an associated laxative (L2 criterion) in 13.8% and finally, drugs duplication (A3 criterion) in 5.7%. The most numerous duplications related to criterion A3 were benzodiazepines (39%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (37.4%).
conclusionsThe method developed and validated in RStudio® with different STOPP criteria allows us to analyse the pharmacological treatment of many patients using different databases and to identify those at risk of suffering a PIP according to the STOPP criteria. Our results indicate a high prevalence of PIPs in patients ≥ 65 years, with polypharmacy being the most common risk factor affecting PIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.