Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322946›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2024

Improving delirium assessments in acute senior health: A quality improvement project for care of the older person.

Charles Taylor, Georgia Peakman, Lauren Mackinnon, Navid Mohamadzade, Wayne Han, Lucy Mackie, Jasmine Gandhi, Oliver Mitchell, Caitlin Bateman-Champain, Joseph Hetherington and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charles TaylorSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Charles.taylor@stgeorges.nhs.uk.
Georgia PeakmanSt George's University of London, London, UK.
Lauren MackinnonSt George's University of London, London, UK.
Navid MohamadzadeSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Wayne HanSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lucy MackieSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jasmine GandhiSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Oliver MitchellSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Caitlin Bateman-ChampainSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Joseph HetheringtonSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fahed BelarbiSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gaggandeep AlgSt George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is a common and reversible neurobehavioral condition with significant morbidity and mortality ramifications for older patients. Consequentially, clear guidelines exist pertaining to its swift identification and management. However, studies suggest that adherence to these guidelines are poor. This audit aimed to evaluate compliance to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (NICE) delirium guidelines in an Acute Senior Health Unit (ASHU) and to present a single centre experience of a low-cost ward-based intervention for improving delirium guideline adherence.

methodsA retrospective observational audit was conducted on patients admitted to ASHU between 01/07/2023 and 30/07/2023. Data on delirium assessments, diagnoses and causes of delirium were obtained through retrospective database searches. Posters and education based multidisciplinary team (MDT) interventions were designed and initiated following grounded thematic literature analysis and ward discussion. A methodically equivalent audit was then conducted between 01/09/2023 and 30/09/23. Data was anonymised and blinded and analysis was performed on SPSS V12.0.

resultsA total of 128 patients were included in the study. Initial audit revealed suboptimal compliance with NICE recommendations. Chi-square test of independence found that patients were statistically more likely to receive a full delirium assessment (1.9% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.001) and formal diagnosis (5.8% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.002) after the ward-based intervention.

conclusionThis study provides limited evidence in favour of low-cost MDT based interventions for improving adherence to NICE delirium guidelines and provides a 5-step framework for future studies. This study also explores the potential patient implications of these interventions. A repeat audit should be conducted to ensure lasting and sustainable change is achieved. TRIAL REGISTRATION/CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: AUDI003614.

Indexed as

DeliriumQuality ImprovementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesDeliriumDementiaFrailtyGeriatricsQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID39322946
PMCPMC11423504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.