ArticleEndocrine2025
Consider or not consider: the unsolved question on the use of radioactive iodine for differentiated thyroid cancer with low to intermediate risk of recurrence.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radioactive iodine and male reproductive health in thyroid cancer survivors: evidence of delayed gonadal dysfunction.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Intermediate risk thyroid cancer management: physician survey.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Moderate- versus high-activity radioactive iodine in intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer: a Canadian cohort study.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- Pre-RAI Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Early and Higher Recurrence Risk in Intermediate-Risk DTC, While PNI and NRI Show No Prognostic Value.Clinical endocrinology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Minimal or absent tumor desmoplasia predicts lower recurrence risk in papillary thyroid carcinoma.European thyroid journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery stands as the cornerstone treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). After surgery, radioactive iodine (RAI) administration is primarily recommended for high-risk patients and commonly employed to address residual disease or mitigate the risk of recurrence. However, the optimal application of RAI in cases categorized as low to intermediate risk is still uncertain. This study aims to assess the indication of post-surgical RAI treatment specifically in patients diagnosed with DTC falling within the low to intermediate risk category for recurrent disease.
methodsretrospective analysis of consecutive patients with DTC falling within the low to intermediate risk category for recurrence and diagnosed between 2009-2015. Patients were categorized into either treated or untreated with RAI. Treatment effect was assessed by the inverse-probability weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA), by balancing the distribution of factors influencing outcome and treatment assignment.
resultsafter surgery, 328 patients (69.9%) were treated with RAI while 141 (30.1%) were left untreated. Across the entire cohort, 44 individuals (9.4%) displayed biochemical or structural disease after a median time of 17.5 months following diagnosis. Recurrent disease was more prevalent in patients who underwent RAI treatment compared to those untreated (12.5% vs 2.1%, respectively, p < 0.001). Factors independently associated with recurrent disease, identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis, included lymph node metastases (pN1) (OR = 4.07; 95% CI 1.84-8.97), male sex (OR = 2.71; 95% CI 1.31-5.59), tumor size (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.06), and microscopic extrathyroidal extension (OR = 2.36; 95% CI 1.15-4.81). IPWRA analysis revealed that the occurrence of recurrent disease was 9.6% (95% CI = 6.3-12.9) in RAI-treated patients and 15.9% (95% CI = 11.1-20.71) in untreated patients (p = 0.021). As a consequence, if all patients underwent RAI treatment, the estimated risk of recurrence would be reduced by 42% (RR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.35-0.91, p = 0.018). The greatest benefit was observed in patients with 2 intermediate risk factors.
conclusionsThese results suggest that treatment with RAI in low to intermediate DTC can reduce the risk of recurrence in selected patients. However, definitive answers regarding whether to consider RAI therapy for this category of patients can only be attained through prospective clinical trials. Up to date these results recommend a meticulous assessment of tumor characteristics at diagnosis to guide the decision regarding RAI administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.