Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322924›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Prevention of radiation induced dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients using cryptomphalus aspersa secretion.

Adriana Fondevilla, Elena Moreno-Olmedo, Juana María Bernal, María José Belmonte, Antonio Nicolás, Escarlata López

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adriana FondevillaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Murcia, Spain. adrifonsol@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-5890
Elena Moreno-OlmedoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vithas La Milagrosa Hospital, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain.
Juana María BernalDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology B and Immunology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
María José BelmonteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Murcia, Spain.
Antonio NicolásGeneral Practitioner, Policlínica Mayor, Molina de Segura, Murcia, Spain.
Escarlata LópezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiotherapy (RT) is a technique widely used in oncology, acquiring special prominence in head and neck cancer (HNC). RT of HNC may be associated with secondary effects including skin reaction, being dermatitis the most common radio-induced side effect during treatment. PURPOSE: The use of a wide variety of agents is reported to handle skin toxicity. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the different level-concentration of Snail Cryptomphalus Aspersa (SCA) that best protect from radiation-induced radiodermatitis in HNC. MATERIAL AND

methodWe performed a single institutional pilot study to assess the skin toxicity with 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% SCA concentration during RT treatment and 1 and 3 months after the treatment finished according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring. A total of 72 patients with HNC diagnosis who received RT with/without Chemotherapy (Ch) between January of 2018 and June of 2020 were assessed. Radiodermatitis grade was stastistically correlated with the SCA level-concentration and with the influence of extranodal extension status (ENE).

resultsA reduction in the rate of grade ≥ II patients' dermatitis was dependent on SCA level-concentration. We found that with higher SCA level-concentration (10 and 15%, patients had 34 and 38% grade ≥ II respectively), this was less than with 0 and 5% SCA level-concentration where a 58% radiodermatitis grade ≥ II was found by Cox regression analysis; p = 0.017 and p = 0.045 respectively.

conclusionWe could conclude that the application of a 10-15% SCA level-concentration after adjusting by ENE, was the best concentration to reduce the rate of grade ≥ II radiodermatitis.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsRadiodermatitisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsCryptomphalus AspersaHead and Neck CancerRadiation induced dermatitisRadiodermatitisRadiotherapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.