Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322853›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

A cost-minimization analysis of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the Netherlands.

Sara W Quist, Hidde Nab, Maarten Postma, Sankha Amarakoon, Freekje van Asten, Roel Freriks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of Biosimilar Aflibercept SDZ-AFL.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara W QuistDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.w.quist@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3871-4239
Hidde NabAsc Academics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maarten PostmaDepartment of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sankha AmarakoonUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Freekje van AstenUniversity Eye Clinic Maastricht, MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Roel FreriksAsc Academics, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of severe vision loss globally. Neovascular AMD (nAMD) is an advanced stage of AMD treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs). Although anti-VEGF treatment is effective, the frequent intravitreal injections place a burden on patients, (in)formal caregivers, and clinics. This study assesses the health-economic impact of anti-VEGF agents with lower injection frequency that have the potential to reduce treatment burden and compares it to the standard of care.

methodsWe developed a cost-minimization model to evaluate the direct medical costs associated with first-line unilateral anti-VEGF treatment across a 3-year time horizon in the Netherlands. The analysis compared aflibercept 8 mg, aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, faricimab, and ranibizumab. Our model adopted a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen for aflibercept 2 mg, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab. For aflibercept 8 mg, a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 24 weeks was applied, while faricimab followed a flexible regimen that was extendable up to 16 weeks. Additionally, since list prices may vary from net prices, we calculated the break-even price for each anti-VEGF in comparison to bevacizumab, which is the recommended first-line treatment due to its low medication price.

resultsBased on list prices, aflibercept 8 mg led to the lowest treatment costs (€16,251 per patient over a 3-year time horizon), closely followed by bevacizumab (€17,616 per patient over a 3-year time horizon). Ranibizumab led to the highest per-patient costs (€31,746 over a 3-year time horizon). For bevacizumab, most costs were attributable to administration, while for the other anti-VEGFs, most were attributable to medication. Aflibercept 8 mg is cost-saving compared to bevacizumab at their medication prices at the time of writing. Aflibercept 2 mg, faricimab, and ranibizumab should be priced below €488, €591, and €75, respectively. To be cost-equal to bevacizumab with current list prices, anti-VEGFs should be administered with a maximum of 12.7 to 13.8 injections over a 3-year time horizon.

conclusionAccording to the injection frequency observed in clinical trials, aflibercept 8 mg would be the anti-VEGF that generates the lowest per-patient healthcare costs for the treatment of nAMD in the Netherlands after a treatment period of three years. Our study indicates that anti-VEGF drugs with a lower injection frequency might provide a cost-saving solution to the increasing burden of anti-VEGF treatment on the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsWet Macular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabDrug CostsHumansIntravitreal InjectionsNetherlandsRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabRanibizumabReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGFsCost-minimisationNeovascular age-related macular degeneration

Identifiers

PMID39322853
PMCPMC11868297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.