ArticleOdontology2025
Retention of strength and ion release of some restorative materials.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of different bi-layer biomimetic strategies of composite resin in large class I cavities: an 18-month randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.Odontology · 2026Review
- Physicochemical characterization of a recently developed resin-based calcium silicate cement compared to established pulp capping materials.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mineralization effect of ion-releasing fiber-reinforced composite in teeth with molar-incisor hypomineralization.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- In Vitro Assessment of Corrosion Rate, Vickers Hardness and SEM Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cements and Calcium Silicate-Based Materials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the retention of strength in accelerated aging condition and ion release from an experimental fiber-reinforced bioactive flowable composite resin (Bio-SFRC), comparing it with various commercially available ion-releasing materials. The flexural strength of Bio-SFRC and other materials (Biodentine, TheraCal LC, Fuji II LC and Surefil one) was evaluated (n = 8) before and after hydrothermal accelerated aging. Ion concentrations of silica and phosphorus were measured after 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 14, and 21 days of specimen immersion in simulated body fluids (SBF) using UV-Vis spectrometry. In addition, ion release and pH change were studied in a continuous dynamic system in SBF over a period of 72 h. SEM and EDS were used to evaluate the microstructure on the top surface of the materials after SBF immersion. Data were statistically analyzed using variance ANOVA analysis (p = 0.05). Bio-SFRC showed higher flexural strength before (134.9 MPa) and after (63.1 MPa) hydrothermal aging compared to other tested materials (p < 0.05). Flexural strength significantly decreased after aging (p < 0.05) except for Fuji II LC which showed no significant differences. Ion release data showed that experimental Bio-SFRC slowly released phosphate ions. Biodentine and TheraCal LC had the strongest ability to form calcium phosphate precipitation on the material surface. Phosphate ion release cannot be detected clearly from these materials. Surefil one and Fuji II LC were more stable materials without any observable ion release. The advantages of fiber containing structure and slow release of ions suggest that experimental Bio-SFRC is a promising bioactive material to provide ions for mineralization of surrounding tissues, and keeping the durability of the materials at higher level than that of other tested materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.