Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322716›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Autologous micrografting improves regeneration of tissue-engineered urinary conduits in vivo.

Nikolai Juul, Mahboobeh Amoushahi, Oliver Willacy, Micki Ji, Chiara Villa, Fatemeh Ajalloueian, Clara Chamorro, Magdalena Fossum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nikolai JuulLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mahboobeh AmoushahiLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oliver WillacyLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Micki JiDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chiara VillaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fatemeh AjalloueianDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Clara ChamorroLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Magdalena FossumLaboratory of Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. magdalena.fossum@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urogenital reconstructive malformation surgery is sometimes hampered by lack of tissue for the repair. We have previously shown that autologous micrografting allows for single-staged scaffold cellularization after surgical implantation. Here, a collagen-based scaffold reinforced with biodegradable mesh and a stent was implanted as a bladder conduit in ten full-grown female minipigs. We aimed to assess short-term regenerative outcomes, safety, and feasibility of implanting tubular urinary micrografted scaffolds versus acellular controls. Five scaffolds were embedded with autologous urothelial micrografts harvested perioperatively. After six weeks, all animals were assessed by cystoscopy, CT-urography, and microanatomical assessment of the urinary conduits. The procedure proved technically feasible within the confines of a regular surgical theater, with duration-times comparable to corresponding conventional procedures. No animals experienced postoperative complications, and all implanted conduits were patent at follow-up. Improved tissue regeneration was observed in the micrografted conduits compared with the acellular controls, including increased luminal epithelialization, increased cell proliferation, decreased cell apoptosis, and increased conduit vascularization. We concluded that single-staged on-site construction and implantation of tissue engineered urinary conduits proved feasible and safe, with improved regenerative potentials in micrografted conduits. This study presents a new approach to urinary conduits, and merits further investigations for advancement towards clinical translation.

Indexed as

RegenerationSwine, MiniatureTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCell ProliferationFemaleStentsSwineTransplantation, AutologousUrinary BladderCongenital abnormalitiesGuided tissue regenerationMicrograftMiniature swinePediatricsTissue EngineeringUrology

Identifiers

PMID39322716
PMCPMC11424640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.