Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Promotion focus, but not prevention focus of teachers and students matters when shifting towards technology-based instruction in schools.

Emely Hoch, Katharina Scheiter, Kai Sassenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emely HochLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Schleichstraße 6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. e.hoch@iwm-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6534-1506
Katharina ScheiterLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Schleichstraße 6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-7544
Kai SassenbergLeibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Schleichstraße 6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6579-8250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementing technology-enhanced learning and teaching in schools causes major changes for both teachers and students. Research in other fields shows that individuals' regulatory orientation (i.e., promotion and prevention focus) predicts how people deal with such fundamental changes. Our research ties in with a school trial where classes were equipped with tablets, yielding a shift from predominantly analog to technology-enhanced learning and teaching. In this context, we investigated whether the regulatory orientation of teachers (N = 109) and students (N = 1,127) related to how they dealt with this change. As expected, teachers with a stronger promotion focus were more likely to perceive the changing teaching situation as a (positively connotated) challenge and to intend to use the tablets in class. Further, students with a strong promotion focus when tablet-based teaching was introduced showed higher technology-related self-efficacy and higher motivation to use digital devices after a few months of using tablets in class. Prevention focus was unrelated to teachers' and students' attitudes, behavioral intentions, or motivation. Thus, the concept of regulatory orientation helps explain how teachers and students respond to changes in school, whereby particularly promotion focus appears to be relevant for change processes due to digital transformation in education.

Indexed as

SchoolsSchool TeachersStudentsAdolescentAdultAttitudeFemaleHumansLearningMaleMotivationSelf EfficacyTeaching

Identifiers

PMID39322657
PMCPMC11424645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.