Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322595›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in China: study protocol for a prospective, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Zizhao Wu, Ting Luo, Yang Yang, Mao Pang, Ruiqiang Chen, Peigen Xie, Bu Yang, Lei He, Zifang Huang, Shangfu Li and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimizing the mathematical model and technical standards for unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery through machine learning-based video analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zizhao Wu *Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ting Luo *Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0000-4737-5289
Yang Yang *Department of Spine Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mao PangThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruiqiang ChenThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Peigen XieThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bu YangThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lei HeThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zifang HuangThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shangfu LiThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jianwen DongThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bin LiuThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Limin RongSpine Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liangming ZhangThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Zhanglm36@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDegenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of low back or leg pain and disability in the elderly population. Patients with spinal stenosis who fail to respond to conservative treatment often require surgical interventions. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with microscopic tubular technique (MT-TLIF) is a well-established procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis. Recently, a novel MIS technique, unilateral biportal endoscopic TLIF (UBE-TLIF), has been frequently performed to treat spinal stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety of using UBE-TLIF in this population have not been well examined. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 96 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis will be randomly assigned to the UBE-TLIF group or the MT-TLIF group at a 1:1 ratio to receive UBE-TLIF or MT-TLIF treatment respectively. The primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 1 year after receiving the surgery. Secondary outcomes include the ODI scores at additional time points, Visual Analogue Scale score, 36-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire, EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire, radiological measurements (disc height, lumbar lordosis angles and vertebral fusion rate) and general condition during hospitalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. All participants of the study will be well informed and written informed consent will be requested. Findings from this trial will be published in peer-reviewed publications, specifically in orthopedic and spinal journals. The completion of this study will not only examine the use of UBE-TLIF in lumbar spinal stenosis but also provide helpful clinical references. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300069333.

Indexed as

EndoscopyLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionSpinal StenosisAdultAgedChinaEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryOrthopaedic & trauma surgerySpine

Identifiers

PMID39322595
PMCPMC11425936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.