Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322591›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effect of volatile anaesthetic agents on intracranial pressure, cerebrovascular flow and autoregulation: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ben Taylor, Jack Ellis, Sam Ponty, Lewis Patrick, Timothy E Scott, Nachiappan Chockalingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ben TaylorStaffordshire University Faculty of Health Sciences, Stoke-on-Trent, UK ben.taylor12@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-3016-2230
Jack EllisUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Sam PontyKeele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Lewis PatrickKeele University Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Timothy E ScottStaffordshire University Faculty of Health Sciences, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Nachiappan ChockalingamStaffordshire University Faculty of Health Sciences, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7072-1271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of volatile anaesthetic agents for the sedation of patients requiring critical care treatment offers several theoretical advantages over intravenous sedation, which may be of benefit in neurocritical care. However, there are concerns that they may increase intracranial pressure. The objective of this systematic review is to assess whether, and if so, to what extent volatile anaesthetic agents affect intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral oximetry and cerebrovascular autoregulation. If sufficient data exist, subgroup analyses will be conducted in traumatic brain injury and decompressive craniectomy patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A database search of PubMed, Medline (including Medline plus), CINAHL (including CINAHL Plus), Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register without time limits will be conducted. The search results will be screened by title and abstract by two independent researchers on a rule-in basis against predetermined criteria-controlled studies in humans of contemporary fluorinated volatile anaesthetic agents against a control, which measures intracranial pressure, CBF, cerebral oximetry or cerebrovascular autoregulation. Articles responsive to screening will then be reviewed in full text by two independent researchers, requiring consensus or a tie-break by a third independent researcher. Reference lists and a non-generative AI tool will be examined for missed articles, with all identified articles being reviewed in full text by two independent researchers. The included articles will be assessed for risk of bias and will have data extracted by two independent researchers. If sufficient data exist, a meta-analysis will be performed; otherwise, a narrative description of outcomes will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval will be sought for this systematic review. This study has no explicit funding. The results of this study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, in a conference presentation and on PROSPERO. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO number CRD42023474587.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationCerebrovascular CirculationHomeostasisIntracranial PressureBrain Injuries, TraumaticHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicOximetryResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicAnesthetics, Inhalationadult anaesthesiaanaesthesia in neurologyintensive & critical caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39322591
PMCPMC11425943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.