Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322589›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Racial and ethnic minority representation in dementia risk factor research: a scoping review of cohort studies.

Arjun Krishnan, Anupa Pathak, Thomas Blyth Nicholas, Jeffrey Lee, Louise Waite, Fiona Stanaway

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Evaluating the Use of Anxiety Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Dementia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advancing global dementia research through equity and inclusion.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Real-world brain imaging in a population-based cohort enables accurate markers for dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arjun KrishnanSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia arjun.krishnan@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5750-2069
Anupa PathakSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas Blyth NicholasIndependent Researcher, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jeffrey LeeSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise WaiteFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Concord Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona StanawaySchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-3010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a potentially greater burden of dementia, racial and ethnic minority populations around the world may be more likely to be excluded from research examining risk factors for incident dementia. We aimed to systematically investigate and quantify racial and ethnic minority representation in dementia risk factor research.

methodsWe performed a two-stage systematic search of databases-MEDLINE (Ovid SP), Embase (Ovid SP) and Scopus-from inception to March 2021 to identify population-based cohort studies looking at risk factors for dementia incidence. We included cohort studies which were population-based and incorporated a clinical dementia diagnosis.

resultsOut of the 97 identified cohort studies, fewer than half (40 studies; 41%) reported the race or ethnicity of participants and just under one-third (29 studies; 30%) reported the inclusion of racial and ethnic minority groups. We found that inadequate reporting frequently prevented assessment of selection bias and only six studies that included racial and ethnic minority participants were at low risk for measurement bias in dementia diagnosis. In cohort studies including a multiethnic cohort, only 182 out of 337 publications incorporated race or ethnicity in data analysis-predominantly (90%) through adjustment for race or ethnicity as a confounder. Only 14 publications (4.2% of all publications reviewed) provided evidence about drivers of any observed inequalities.

conclusionsRacial and ethnic minority representation in dementia risk factor research is inadequate. Comparisons of dementia risk between different racial and ethnic groups are likely hampered by significant selection and measurement bias. Moreover, the focus on 'adjusting out' the effect of race and ethnicity as a confounder prevents understanding of underlying drivers of observed inequalities. There is a pressing need to fundamentally change the way race, ethnicity and the inclusion of racial and ethnic minorities are considered in research if health inequalities are to be adequately addressed.

Indexed as

DementiaEthnic and Racial MinoritiesCohort StudiesEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsRisk Factorsagingdementiageriatric medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID39322589
PMCPMC11733783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.