ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2024
Spatial Cognition Ability in Surgeons Performing Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic surgery, including endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS), requires special psychomotor skills from surgeons. The learning curve in the acquisition of psychomotor skills varies among individuals, and studies about laparoscopy indicate that the difference can be predicted using spatial ability tests. We examined the association between the results of such tests and the learning curve in ETSS to determine the need for a personalized curriculum for ETSS skill training. A total of 30 fifth-year medical students from Kindai University School of Medicine (17 men, 13 women; mean age, 26 years) without ETSS experience completed the spatial orientation test (SOT) for the measurement of spatial visualization ability. They performed the dural incision task (DIT) twice on an ETSS training model for surgical psychomotor skill evaluation. The SOT scores (angle errors) exhibited substantial individual differences in spatial visualization ability, whereas the DIT scores significantly improved in the second trial (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.0035). However, no significant difference was observed in the DIT scores between the smaller error and larger error groups of the SOT. The results indicated that two DIT trials were sufficient to acquire psychomotor skills for the DIT as the endoscope was almost fixed and learning only one viewpoint and line of sight combination was adequate. In conclusion, a personalized ETSS training program based on the trainee's spatial ability is not necessary for the DIT. Further research is warranted to determine the effect of spatial ability on more complex tasks, such as suturing in cranial base repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.