ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2024
The Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis in Japan: A Subanalysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stent angioplasty in patients with vertebral artery ostial stenosis: clinical and angiographic outcomes in 525 patients.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Article
- Dedicated drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for vertebral artery origin stenosis: a real-world single-center experience.BMC neurology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a potential therapeutic option for extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis; however, its efficacy or optimal procedures remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the recent status of EVT for extracranial VA stenosis in Japan using a nationwide registry. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4 that enrolled patients who underwent EVT at 166 hospitals in Japan from 2015 to 2019. The outcomes of this study were as follows: procedural success indicating that the planned procedure was completed, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 30 days, and procedure-related complications evaluated according to the procedure during EVT (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty vs. stenting and with or without the use of embolic protection devices [EPDs]). Of 308 eligible patients, 301 (95%) were treated for atherosclerotic stenosis, predominantly by stenting (74%). EPDs were used in 43%, primarily with the distal balloon (63%). The proportion of procedural success was 98%. Functional independence (mRS of 0-2) at 30 days was achieved in 80% of the total cohort, and there were no differences between patients treated with or without stenting or EPDs (74% vs. 82%, p = 0.12, and 80% vs. 80%, p = 0.93). Procedural complications occurred in 28 (9.1%) patients similarly in each group, with distal embolism and vessel dissection being common. In conclusion, EVT is a reasonable option for extracranial VA stenosis as a daily clinical practice. This study emphasizes the potential of EVT in managing extracranial VA stenosis and the need for further research to refine treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.