Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322544›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2024

The Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Extracranial Vertebral Artery Stenosis in Japan: A Subanalysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4.

Satoru Fujiwara, Akira Ishii, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Nobuyuki Ohara, Michi Kawamoto, Koji Iihara, Hirotoshi Imamura, Yuji Matsumaru, Chiaki Sakai, Tetsu Satow and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Satoru FujiwaraDepartment of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Akira IshiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University.
Tsuyoshi OhtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Nobuyuki OharaDepartment of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Michi KawamotoDepartment of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Koji IiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Hirotoshi ImamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Yuji MatsumaruDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba.
Chiaki SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University.
Tetsu SatowDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kindai University.
Shinichi YoshimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Medical University.
Nobuyuki SakaiSeijinkai Shimizu Hospital.
Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a potential therapeutic option for extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis; however, its efficacy or optimal procedures remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the recent status of EVT for extracranial VA stenosis in Japan using a nationwide registry. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy 4 that enrolled patients who underwent EVT at 166 hospitals in Japan from 2015 to 2019. The outcomes of this study were as follows: procedural success indicating that the planned procedure was completed, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 30 days, and procedure-related complications evaluated according to the procedure during EVT (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty vs. stenting and with or without the use of embolic protection devices [EPDs]). Of 308 eligible patients, 301 (95%) were treated for atherosclerotic stenosis, predominantly by stenting (74%). EPDs were used in 43%, primarily with the distal balloon (63%). The proportion of procedural success was 98%. Functional independence (mRS of 0-2) at 30 days was achieved in 80% of the total cohort, and there were no differences between patients treated with or without stenting or EPDs (74% vs. 82%, p = 0.12, and 80% vs. 80%, p = 0.93). Procedural complications occurred in 28 (9.1%) patients similarly in each group, with distal embolism and vessel dissection being common. In conclusion, EVT is a reasonable option for extracranial VA stenosis as a daily clinical practice. This study emphasizes the potential of EVT in managing extracranial VA stenosis and the need for further research to refine treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresRegistriesVertebrobasilar InsufficiencyAgedAged, 80 and overEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedStentsTreatment Outcomeembolic protection deviceendovascular treatmentregistrystentingvertebral artery

Identifiers

PMID39322544
PMCPMC11617352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.