ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy
Is galactomannan a useful tool for triage and diagnosis of oral invasive aspergillosis?
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of the galactomannan serum test in diagnosing oral invasive aspergillosis.
methodsThis prospective observational study included oncohematological neutropenic patients with suspected invasive aspergillosis, but without signs of pulmonary involvement. These patients underwent nasofibroscopy, biopsy, galactomannan serum testing, and maxillofacial high-resolution computed tomography to diagnose invasive aspergillosis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of those with proven invasive aspergillosis, while Group 2 included patients without proven invasive aspergillosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated.
resultsThirteen patients were included in Group 1 and four in Group 2. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were 0.69, 1.0, 1.0 and 0.5, respectively. Sensitivity was higher in cases with Aspergillus sinusitis than in cases with exclusive oral lesions (0.77 versus 0.5, respectively). The galactomannan serum test optical density index was higher in Group 1 (2.4; range 0.2-3.5) than in Group 2 (0.2; range: 0.1-0.3; P-value = 0.007.
conclusionsThe galactomannan serum test is a valuable tool for screening invasive aspergillosis, especially in cases with nasal or sinus involvement, but biopsy is still the gold standard for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.