Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2025
Comparison between effects of reverse curve of Spee nickel titanium archwire and stainless steel archwires with and without torque on the lower incisors in deep overbite treatment: a randomized control study.
Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional study of mandibular anterior intrusion with clear aligners for adult deep-bite correction.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Predictability of anterior teeth intrusion overcorrection design and its influencing factors: deep bite correction with Invisalign.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Patient Satisfaction with Anterior Bite Turbos: A Prospective Clinical Trial.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Predictability of curve of Spee levelling and vertical tooth movements in the lower arch with clear aligners based on cone-beam computed tomography.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Biomechanical analysis of clear aligners for mandibular anterior teeth intrusion and its clinical application in the design of new aligner attachment.Progress in orthodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the effect between three different reverse curve of Spee (RCOS) archwires: 0.016 × 0.022-inch Nickel-Titanium and 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel (SS) with and without crown labial torque (CLT) on lower incisors during deep overbite treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighty subjects with deep overbite were randomly divided into three groups: the first group (mean age: 20.5 years) received SS RCOS with CLT, the second group (mean age: 19.4 years) was treated with 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS RCOS with zero CLT, the third group (mean age: 18.2 years) was treated with rocking-chair nickel-titanium (NiTi) 0.016 × 0.022-inch with RCOS. Two lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, one after alignment and the second after deep bite correction. These images were superimposed using the corpus axis to study the lower incisor horizontal and vertical changes.
resultsThe lower incisor angular change was significantly smaller in Group II (-0.3°) compared to Group I (4.8°) and Group III (6.0°, P ≤ .001). Lower incisor anterior movement was reduced in Group II compared to Group I (P = .014) and Group III (P = .008). Group III showed significantly more downward movement of the lower Incisors (P ≤ .001). The three groups showed comparable amounts of true intrusion (1 mm, P = .536).
conclusions0.016 × 0.022-inch NiTi and 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS with crown labial torque RCOS archwires resulted in similar proclination and forward movement of the lower incisors. Removal of anterior crown labial torque from the 0.019 × 0.025-inch SS RCOS archwire prevents lower incisor proclination and forward movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.