Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39322115›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2024

Collaborating to heal addiction and mental health in primary care (CHAMP): A protocol for a hybrid type 2a trial.

John C Fortney, Anna D Ratzliff, Brittany E Blanchard, Lori Ferro, Julien Rouvere, Erin Chase, Mark H Duncan, Joseph O Merrill, Tracy Simpson, Emily C Williams and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

John C FortneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: fortneyj@uw.edu.
Anna D RatzliffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Brittany E BlanchardDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Lori FerroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Julien RouvereDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Erin ChaseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Mark H DuncanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Joseph O MerrillDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Tracy SimpsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Emily C WilliamsCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elizabeth J AustinCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Health Services Research & Development, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Geoffrey M CurranCollege of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA; Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Michael SchoenbaumNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Andrew J SaxonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America; Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, United States of America.

Funding

Collaborating to Heal Addiction and Mental Health in Primary care (CHAMP)UF1MH121942 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FORTNEY, JOHN C., RATZLIFF, ANNA · 2019 to 2019
$14.8M
NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA056956NIMH NIH HHS UF1 MH121942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gold-standard treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is medication for OUD (MOUD). However, less than a quarter of people with OUD initiate MOUD. Expanding the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) to include primary care patients with OUD could improve access to and initiation of MOUD. This paper presents the methods and baseline sample characteristics of a Hybrid Type 2a trial comparing the effectiveness of CoCM for OUD and co-occurring mental health symptoms (MHS) to CoCM for MHS only.

method42 primary care clinics were cluster randomized and 254 primary care patients with OUD and elevated MHS were enrolled. Recruitment was terminated early by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for futility. Participants completed research assessments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The multiple primary outcomes were past-month number of days of nonmedical opioid use and SF12 Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) scores.

resultsMCS scores were over a standard deviation below the national mean (M = 34.5). Nearly half (47.6 %) of participants had previously overdosed in their lifetimes. Three quarters (76.0 %) were already being prescribed MOUD at baseline, only 30.4 % reported non-medical use of opioids, and only 33.9 % reported being bothered by opioid cravings.

conclusionThe unexpectedly high proportion of enrollees already prescribed MOUD at baseline indicates that most patients were in the maintenance rather than acute phase of treatment. Challenges identifying and enrolling patients in the acute phase of OUD treatment implies that intervention effectiveness will depend on its success preventing the discontinuation of MOUD rather than initiating MOUD.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineCollaborative careHybrid trialOpioid use disorderPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39322115
PMCPMC11584174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.