Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39321461›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Ayurveda Management of Allergic Rhinitis: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shweta Mata, Shivshankar Rajput, Isha Preet Tuli, Pallavi Mundada, Bharti Gupta, Narayanam Srikanth, Rabinarayanan Acharya

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shweta MataCentral Ayurveda Research Institute, Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7427-3955
Shivshankar RajputCentral Ayurveda Research Institute, Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-2292
Isha Preet TuliVardhman Mahavir Medical College, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5601-6157
Pallavi MundadaCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3326-2165
Bharti GuptaCentral Ayurveda Research Institute, Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1245-8986
Narayanam SrikanthCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-4978
Rabinarayanan AcharyaCentral Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences, Ministry of Ayush, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4413-1937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) is the inflammation of the membranes lining the nose due to allergen exposure and is characterized by sneezing, nasal congestion, itching of the nose, or postnasal discharge. The prevalence varies worldwide, perhaps due to the geographic and aeroallergen differences, with 10% to 30% of the world's population experiencing AR. In this study, Anu Taila Nasya, Naradiya Laxmivilas Rasa, and Shirishadi Kwath will be compared to a fluticasone nasal spray.

objectiveThe primary aim is to assess the efficacy of Ayurvedic management for AR (or vataja pratishyaya) by comparing it to a conventional control group. The secondary aims are to determine the mean change in the nasal endoscopy index and the mean change in the laboratory tests.

methodsThis ongoing study is an open-label randomized controlled interventional trial, with a sample size of 90 both in the trial and standard control group (including dropouts, 20%), and will be carried out for 24 months. Participants in the trial group will receive Ayurvedic treatment, that is, Anu Taila Nasya (6 drops in each nostril for 7 days for 3 consecutive weeks), Naradiya Laxmivilas Rasa (250 mg twice per day), and Shirishadi Kwath (40 ml twice per day for 45 days). The participants in the control group will receive a fluticasone propionate nasal spray (2 sprays once per day for 45 days). The primary outcome will include the mean change in the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test score, and the secondary outcomes will include the mean change in the nasal endoscopy index (assessment of nasal membrane color, pale or hyperemia; rhinorrhea, watery or yellow; and inferior turbinate swelling, hypertrophy) and the mean change in the laboratory tests.

resultsAs of May 2024, 72 patients have been enrolled in both groups. Data analysis should be completed by February 2025. The study will be reported following standard guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials. Clinical results will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed publication in a relevant journal.

conclusionsThe Ayurvedic approach could be an evidence-based therapeutic tactic for the management of AR.

trial registrationClinical Trials Registry India CTRI/2023/06/053395; https://tinyurl.com/564d2zz8. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56063.

Indexed as

Medicine, AyurvedicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhinitis, AllergicAdolescentAdultFemaleFluticasoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultFluticasoneallergic rhinitisAnu Taila NasyaARfluticasone propionate nasal sprayNaradiya Laxmivilas Rasarandomized controlled trialShrishadi Kwath

Identifiers

PMID39321461
PMCPMC11464932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.