Trial reportBlood advances2024
Outcomes in children with provoked venous thrombosis and antiphospholipid antibodies: findings from the Kids-DOTT trial.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00687882 (Prospective Multi-Center Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Multi-Center Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The predictive value of aGAPSS score combined with clinical factors for thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome: expanding our understanding of antiphospholipid syndrome in children.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractFew studies have prospectively evaluated the incidence and outcomes in children with provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) and transient or persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). We compared outcomes of patients aged <21 years with a first-episode acute provoked VTE and positive aPL at diagnosis, enrolled in the Multicenter Evaluation of the Duration of Therapy for Thrombosis in Children trial. aPLs were tested at enrollment and, when positive, repeated at 6 weeks after VTE diagnosis. Subsequent testing was performed at the discretion of the treating hematologist. Of 524 patients, 116 (22%) had positive aPLs at enrollment. At follow-up, 70 (60%) had transient (n = 66) or low-titer aPLs (n = 4), 11 (10%) had persistent aPLs meeting the criteria for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), and 35 (30%) had no repeat testing. Patients with APS were older (15.8 vs 9.9 years; P = .014) and had a statistically significant higher risk of symptomatic recurrent VTE (18% vs 1%; odds ratio [OR], 12.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-108; P = .025) and a statistically nonsignificant but clinically meaningful difference in the risk of anticoagulant-related clinically relevant bleeding (9% vs 0%; OR, 20.1; 95% CI, 0.7-558; P = .077) compared with those in the transient or low-titer aPL group. In conclusion, aPLs are common in young patients with acute provoked VTE and are mostly transitory and clinically insignificant. Patients with APS and provoked VTE appear to have an increased risk of recurrent VTE compared with patients with transitory or low-titer aPLs. Future collaborative studies should investigate the optimal VTE management for children with provoked VTE who meet the criteria for APS. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00687882.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.