ArticleBlood advances2024
Myeloid clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared clonal origin of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma arising through divergent evolution from a common precursor.Journal of hematopathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Longitudinal Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Clonal Hematopoiesis and Genomic Heterogeneity as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Newly Diagnosed, Elderly Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Clonal haematopoiesis in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: Biology, inflammaging and clinical implications in the era of targeted therapy.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Dissecting clonal hematopoiesis in the myeloid compartment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter transformation.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- The burden dynamics of leukemia in China from 1990 to 2021: an epidemiological analysis of trends, risk factors, and projections to 2036.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractClonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been extensively characterized. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of myeloid CHIP (M-CHIP) in patients with CLL, and to determine its association with time to first treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS). We retrospectively analyzed data from patients participating in a prospective CLL database at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who had standard-of-care targeted 95-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed. A schema was devised to classify mutations as M-CHIP related. M-CHIP was analyzed as a binary (present/absent) and categorical (≥2 vs 1 vs 0 mutations) predictor. We included 966 patients (median age at time of NGS, 65 years; 38% female). Overall, 747 (77%) patients had NGS performed before CLL treatment, whereas 219 (23%) had it performed after receiving treatment. Median follow-up time from NGS was 1.9 years. The prevalence of M-CHIP in untreated (12%) and treated (24%) patients with CLL was similar to that described in previous literature. M-CHIP prevalence appeared to increase with age in untreated patients, but appeared consistent across age in treated patients, suggesting that treatment (85% had prior chemotherapy) may have an impact on M-CHIP emergence even in younger patients. The presence of ≥2 M-CHIP mutations was associated with OS, even accounting for prior treatment and age, but was driven by a small subset of patients (n = 28). M-CHIP was not associated with TTFT. These findings support continued work into characterizing the effects of M-CHIP in patients with CLL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.