ArticleJournal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
Improving ICD Coding in the Emergency Department: Factors Related to Use of "Unspecified" Codes for Head and Brain Injury.
Article in Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextInternational Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are used for billing but also for surveillance for injuries such as traumatic brain injuries (TBI). While specificity is possible in the ICD-10-CM scheme, use of the code for unspecified injury of head (SO9.9) remains high.
objectivesThis process evaluation sought to understand medical ICD-10-CM coding behaviors for TBI in emergency department (ED) settings.
designSemi-structured interviews explored the processes that facilitate or hinder ED physicians from selecting specific ICD codes for TBI and potential points of intervention for increased coding specificity and reducing the use of unspecified codes.
settingVideo interviews were conducted with a nationwide sample in the United States.
participantsA purposive snowball sampling strategy was used to recruit 26 ED physicians with experience diagnosing TBI.
interventionSemi-structured interviews identified factors related to the selection of specific ICD codes for head injury.
main outcome measureThematic analysis of transcribed data.
resultsFour main themes emerged from the data: the impact of training and expertise, factors related to diagnosis, unclear connections with medical coders, and actionable recommendations. Interviews underscored the context surrounding "unspecified" codes for TBI, including demands from patient care, time pressures, issues around how a diagnosis may impact patient management decisions, and considerations related to mapping within the electronic medical record (EMR) where options may default to an unspecified code.
conclusionsFindings from this analysis indicate that ED providers may benefit from more robust training on how documentation can better support ICD-10-CM coding for this type of trauma. Revised EMR structures could support efficient coding specificity and clarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.