Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39321289›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Muscle-controlled physics simulations of bird locomotion resolve the grounded running paradox.

Pasha A van Bijlert, A J van Soest, Anne S Schulp, Karl T Bates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New perspectives on head and neck allometry and ecomorphology in tetrapods.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pasha A van BijlertDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Vening Meinesz Building A, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5567-7022
A J van SoestDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-1061
Anne S SchulpDepartment of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Vening Meinesz Building A, Princetonlaan 8A, 3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9389-1540
Karl T BatesDepartment of Musculoskeletal and Ageing Science, Institute of Life Course & Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, The William Henry Duncan Building, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0048-141X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and birds use very different running styles. Unlike humans, birds adopt "grounded running" at intermediate speeds-a running gait where at least one foot always maintains ground contact. Avian grounded running is a paradox: Animals usually minimize locomotor energy expenditure, but birds prefer grounded running despite incurring higher energy costs. Using predictive gait simulations of the emu (

Indexed as

BirdsRunningAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationGaitLocomotionModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalPosture

Identifiers

PMID39321289
PMCPMC11423892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.