Observational studyEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2024
An analysis of early and long-term gender-related outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
Observational study in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate gender-related outcomes during endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases (TEVAR).
methodsMulticentre, retrospective, observational cohort study. All TEVARs between January 2005 and April 2023 were identified. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and cumulative survival. Secondary outcomes were vascular access complications, and freedom from TEVAR-related reintervention. Interventions performed in male patients were matched to females on the basis of a one-to-one coarsened exact matching.
resultsWe identified 151 males who were matched with 151 females. Mortality at 30 days was not statistically different between females and males (11.2% vs 11.2%; P = 1.0). At binary logistic regression analysis, duration of intervention (P = 0.001) and emergency TEVAR (P = 0.001) were associated with mortality at 30 days. Gender did not impact the access vessel complication rate [n = 6 (4.0%) vs n = 5 (3.3%); P = 1.0]. The median follow-up was 46 (interquartile range, 7-84) months with no difference between males and females [median 50 (11-95) vs 37.5 (3.5-71.2); P = 0.153]. Estimated survival was not statistically different between females and males [log-rank χ2 = 0.6, P = 0.442; 95% confidence interval (CI) 110.7-207.3]. At Cox's regression analysis, gender did not impact overall survival (hazard ratio 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-1.3; P = 0.450). Estimated freedom from TEVAR-related reinterventions was not statistically different between females and males (log-rank χ2 = 0.4, P = 0.837; 95% CI 187.8-219.3).
conclusionsFemale gender itself was not associated with worse 30-day mortality and late survival than males with similar access vessel complication as well as TEVAR-related reintervention rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.