SynthesisJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024
Patient-reported Outcomes After Medial Meniscus Root Tear Repair Versus Other Medial Meniscus Repairs: An Exploratory Meta-analysis of Single-arm Cohorts.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of repair techniques for meniscal root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to (1) compare patient-reported outcome measures between patients who underwent medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) repair and those who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair, and (2) identify factors associated with observed differences.
methodsA literature search identified studies reporting PROMs-knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) or visual analog scale (VAS) for pain-after repair of the medial meniscus. Studies were excluded if outcomes were not separated by tear type or reported graphically, different or no outcomes reported, no repair or repair with a sutureless method, follow-up greater than 72 months, case report, and systematic review. Patient-reported outcome measures and demographics were summarized as sample-weighted means and compared using t-tests. Mixed model linear regressions were fit predicting postoperative PROMs adjusted for tear type, preoperative PROMs, and follow-up time. F statistics of type III tests of fixed effects were compared.
resultsEighteen articles were included, n = 10 received MMRT repair and n = 8 other tear repairs. Postoperative values for all KOOS scores were less for the MMRT repair group compared with the other tear repair group, VAS pain was not statistically different. Tear type was a stronger predictor for postoperative PROMs than the preoperative score and duration of follow-up for all KOOS scores, but not VAS pain. On average, the MMRT repair group had shorter follow-up, more women, older age, and greater BMI. DISCUSSION: All postoperative PROMs except for VAS pain were worse for patients who underwent MMRT repair compared with patients who underwent other types of medial meniscus repair. Tear type was a better predictor of postoperative PROMs despite intergroup differences in preoperative PROMs and duration of follow-up. Relative risk factors for MMRT compared with other types of medial meniscus tears include older age, greater BMI, and female sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.