ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Toward Large Ablations With Single-Needle High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation In Vivo.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and Efficacy of an Irreversible Electroporation System with Real-Time Electrical and Thermal Monitoring for Liver Tumors: A Bicentric Retrospective Study.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Observational
- Endoluminal Catheter Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Irreversible electroporation ablation with bipolar electrodes: ultrasound findings of ablation zones.Radiology and oncology · 2026Article
- High-intensity irreversible electroporation targeting intracellular structures enhance tumor ablation in lung cancer models.PloS one · 2026Article
- Recombinant human type-5 adenovirus (H101) combined with radiofrequency ablation versus traditional radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3 cm: a phase III randomized controlled trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Mitigating muscle contractions during pulsed field ablation by utilizing intersegment delays.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a minimally thermal tissue ablation modality used to treat solid tumors adjacent to critical structures. Widespread clinical adoption of IRE has been limited due to complicated anesthetic management requirements and technical demands associated with placing multiple needle electrodes in anatomically challenging environments. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) delivered using a novel single-insertion bipolar probe system could potentially overcome these limitations, but ablation volumes have remained small using this approach. While H-FIRE is minimally thermal in mode of action, high voltages or multiple pulse trains can lead to unwanted Joule heating. In this work, we improve the H-FIRE waveform design to increase the safe operating voltage using a single-insertion bipolar probe before electrical arcing occurs. By uniformly increasing interphase () and interpulse () delays, we achieved higher maximum operating voltages for all pulse lengths. Additionally, increasing pulse length led to higher operating voltages up to a certain delay length (25 μs), after which shorter pulses enabled higher voltages. We then delivered novel H-FIRE waveforms via an actively cooled single-insertion bipolar probe in swine liver in vivo to determine the upper limits to ablation volume possible using a single-needle H-FIRE device. Ablations up to 4.62 0.12 cm x 1.83 0.05 cm were generated in 5 minutes without a requirement for cardiac synchronization during treatment. Ablations were minimally thermal, easily visualized with ultrasound, and stimulated an immune response 24 hours post H-FIRE delivery. These data suggest H-FIRE can rapidly produce clinically relevant, minimally thermal ablations with a more user-friendly electrode design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.