Trial reportJAMA dermatology2024
Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin (HSK16149) in Adults with Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05140863 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 12-Week, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HSK16149 Capsules in Chinese Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 12-Week, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HSK16149 Capsules in Chinese Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of different medications compared for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Crisugabalin Combined with Acetyl-Levo-Carnitine for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Trial
- Untangling neuropathic pain: pathophysiological insights and future directions for targeted therapy.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Postherpetic Neuralgia: Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Stratified Management-A Narrative Review.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- Efficacy and safety of HSK16149 for postoperative pain in Chinese patients after orthopedic surgery: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel potent GABA analogue crisugabalin in Chinese subjects with various degrees of renal impairment.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Post-Herpetic Neuralgia: Review of Pathophysiology, Mechanisms, and Drug Treatment.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Therapy Using Single High-Dose S-Ketamine Infusion for Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint Study Protocol.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin (HSK16149) in Fibromyalgia Patients: Protocol for a Prospective Randomized Open Blinded-Endpoint (PROBE) Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Crisugabalin for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A 52-Week, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Rapid Onset of Pain Relief with Crisugabalin in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Findings from a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Calcium Channel Blockers in Neuropsychiatric, Endocrine and Pain Disorders.Cells · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of High-Voltage, Long-Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Elderly: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Updates in the Treatment of Rosacea with γ-Aminobutyric Acid Derivatives.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: China carries a heavy burden of postherpetic neuralgia, with an unmet need for novel drugs with greater efficacy and less prominent neurotoxic effects than existing calcium channel ligands. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of crisugabalin, an oral calcium channel α2δ-1 subunit ligand, for postherpetic neuralgia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial, carried out between November 9, 2021, and January 5, 2023, at 48 tertiary care centers across China had 2 parts. Part 1 was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisting of a 2-week screening period, a 7-day run-in period, and a 12-week double-blind treatment period. Part 2 was a 14-week open-label extension study. Investigators, statisticians, trial clinicians, and patients were blinded to trial group assignments. Participants included adults with postherpetic neuralgia with an average daily pain score (ADPS) of at least 4 on the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale over the preceding week, with the exclusion of patients with pain not controlled by prior therapy with pregabalin (≥300 mg/d) or gabapentin (≥1200 mg/d). Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive crisugabalin, 20 mg twice daily (ie, 40 mg/d), and crisugabalin, 40 mg twice daily (ie, 80 mg/d), or placebo for 12 weeks. Eligible patients received crisugabalin, 40 mg, twice daily during extension. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in ADPS at week 12. Results: The study enrolled 366 patients (121 patients receiving crisugabalin, 40 mg/d; 121 patients receiving crisugabalin, 80 mg/d; 124 patients receiving placebo; median [IQR] age, 63.0 [56.0-69.0] years; 193 men [52.7%]). At week 12, the least squares mean (SD) change from baseline in ADPS was -2.2 (0.2) for crisugabalin, 40 mg/d, and -2.6 (0.2) for crisugabalin, 80 mg/d, vs -1.1 (0.2) for placebo, with a least squares mean difference of -1.1 (95% CI, -1.6 to -0.7; P < .001) and -1.5 (-95% CI, -2.0 to -1.0; P < .001) vs placebo, respectively. No new safety concerns emerged. Conclusions and Relevance: Crisugabalin, 40 mg/d, or crisugabalin, 80 mg/d, was well tolerated and demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in ADPS over placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05140863.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.