ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Comparison of ganglion cell layer thickness and pattern electroretinography among glaucoma suspects and healthy controls.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the difference in ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and waveform on pattern electroretinography (PERG) among glaucoma suspects and healthy controls.
methodsAn analytical, cross-sectional study was done on 100 eyes of 50 subjects, equally divided in the glaucoma suspect and control group. Subjects with an asymmetrically increased vertical cup-to-disc ratio and without any perimetric change were taken as suspects, and subjects with normal findings were taken as controls. GCL thickness was evaluated on spectral domain OCT at 3 mm, 3.45 mm, and 6 mm centering the foveola, and P50, N95 wave forms were recorded according to the standard PERG protocol.
resultsIn this study, we observed that the average GCL thickness is significantly less in glaucoma suspects at 3.45 mm (p = 0.045) and at 6 mm (p < 0.001) circle zone. On PERG, P50 amplitude was significantly low in glaucoma suspects in comparison to controls (p = 0.007). There was significantly increased implicit time for both P50 and N95 in glaucoma suspects (p < 0.001). For N95 amplitude, a non-significant (p = 0.127) difference was observed among the two groups. At 3.45 mm, average GCL thickness showed a weak negative correlation with N95 implicit time (r = - 0.286, p = 0.044), a weak positive correlation with P50 amplitude (r = 0.349, p = 0.013), and at 6 mm, a weak positive correlation with P50 amplitude (r = 0.311, p = 0.028) in glaucoma suspects.
conclusionsAnalysing GCL thickness can help in the structural assessment of preperimetric glaucoma. PERG can be used as a valuable tool for the detection of ganglion cell dysfunction, even before cell loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39320616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.