Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39320585›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Direct Primary Care: Financial Analysis and Potential to Reshape the U.S. Healthcare Landscape.

Halle Tecco, Faraan Owais Rahim, Pooja Lalwani, Sandeep Palakodeti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Halle TeccoColumbia Business School, New York, NY, USA.
Faraan Owais RahimHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1305-0720
Pooja LalwaniDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6338-9006
Sandeep PalakodetiDSP Health, Granville, OH, USA. sandeep.palakodeti1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the United States faces a looming shortage of primary care physicians and escalating rates of clinician burnout, there is a pressing need to explore alternative models of primary care delivery. Direct Primary Care (DPC) is an emerging primary care model in which patients enroll in a membership plan and make direct monthly or yearly payments to a DPC practice for specific primary care services. Although DPC holds the potential to enhance patient care and mitigate clinician burnout, no published studies provide a financial analysis of DPC practices or compare them to traditional fee-for-service (FFS) primary care models. In this article, we present an evidence-based analysis of theoretical DPC and FFS primary care practices. We demonstrate that the DPC practice can yield upwards of $25,000 in annual cost savings over the FFS practice while also providing more personalized patient care. Thus, we argue that the cost-effectiveness and value-based approach of DPC positions the model as a transformative force in reshaping the American healthcare landscape towards a more patient-centric, accessible, and resilient future.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePrimary Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisFee-for-Service PlansHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39320585
PMCPMC11803065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.