Trial reportDysphagia2025
Effect of Rest Interval Length on Oral Swallowing Pressure During Effortful Swallowing Exercises in Healthy Adults: A Crossover Design.
Trial report in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence supporting the prescription of effortful swallowing (ES) as a rehabilitation exercise remains lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of rest interval length between sets on oral swallowing pressure during ES exercises in healthy adults. This study was a randomized trial of participants using a crossover design. Forty-three healthy adults (25.0 ± 3.7 years; 32 women and 11 men) without swallowing difficulties were recruited and participated in all four conditions (rest intervals between sets: 0-, 1-, 3-, and 5-min intervals) in a random order. The exercise constituted five sets, each comprising 10 ES repetitions. ES was performed with saliva swallows. The rest interval between each repetition was fixed at 10 s, and the oral swallowing pressure during ES was measured using a tongue pressure measuring device. Oral swallowing pressures were significantly lower in the fifth set than in the first set at the 0-min rest condition. In the comparison by condition, oral swallowing pressures were significantly higher in the 5-min than in the 0-min rest conditions in the fourth set and in the 3- and 5-min rest conditions than in the 0-min rest condition in the fifth set. A rest interval of appropriate length between sets during ES exercises may consistently maintain the targeted high swallowing pressures during the exercises. Further studies using more diverse equipment and targeting older patients and those with dysphagia are required to determine the effect of the rest interval length between sets on the degree of exercise intensity to improve the swallowing-related muscle strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39320511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.